Case study · Executive Team
Leadership reset in a Swiss industrial SME
An established Swiss industrial SME faced the situation many companies of this size experience after growth and succession: more topics, more people, the same leadership architecture as ten years ago. Everything drifted upwards. Little got decided.
- Duration
- 9 months
- Architecture fields
- LeadershipDecision ArchitectureCulture
- Industrie
- Industrial · family-owned · 220 employees

01
Starting point
The executive team was capable — but overloaded. Topics were discussed at length and rarely resolved formally. Business unit leaders expected clarity without taking mandates themselves. Culture was called "good", but didn't hold under pressure: conflicts got postponed, decisions were quietly reversed, responsibility stayed diffuse.
- 01Exec meetings routinely ran over four hours without binding decisions.
- 02Unit leaders worked hard, but on topics without a clear mandate.
- 03HR and leadership held different pictures of what "leadership" meant in this house.
- 04Two strategic initiatives had been running for over a year with no traction.
02
Intervention
We didn't restructure. We clarified the architecture behind the structure — in four phases, together with the exec and extended leadership.
- 01
Phase 1
Mapping
Interviews with exec team, unit leaders and board. Making the actually lived decision logic visible — not the official one.
- 02
Phase 2
Decision Architecture
Who decides what, with what mandate, in what latitude, with what consequence. Role profiles for exec and unit leaders aligned with real responsibility.
- 03
Phase 3
Leadership format
Rebuild of the exec rhythm: strategic, operational and cultural spaces separated. Clear standard for minutes and decisions.
- 04
Phase 4
Cultural anchoring
Regular reflection spaces for the extended leadership. Language, rituals and expectations of leadership sharpened together.
03
Impact
Nine months later the same team led the same organisation — with visibly less friction, clearer decisions and a leadership culture that also holds under pressure.
−60%
exec meeting duration
1 level
less escalation in daily work
9 of 9
unit leaders with clear mandate
«We didn't get a new structure. We understood how our old one works — and what we needed to change so leadership could be leadership again.»
Note — Anonymised. Figures are approximations from the mandate's internal reporting.
Clarity begins in conversation
A similar question
in your own house?
First conversation: shared clarification, no sales. No pitch. An honest map.

